Building Public Interest AI: Catalytic Funding for Equitable Access to Compute Resources

Detailed Summary

  • Purpose – The moderator frames the session as a move from “diagnosis to action” on the compute divide that is turning the digital divide into a compute divide.
  • Key Message – Democratisation of AI is not merely “catch‑up” but “expanding who gets to lead”. India’s AI Mission and its Compute Capacity Plan (≈ 38,000 GPUs) are presented as a flagship public‑interest model that can be replicated across the Global South.
  • Three‑Act Structure – The discussion will explore (i) What is being democratised?, (ii) How South‑South partnerships & catalytic financing accelerate progress?, and (iii) Concrete commitments for the year.

2. Launch of the Working Report (Moderator)

  • The working report titled “Opening up Computational Resources for New AI Futures” is released.
  • The report was drafted by the Democratising AI Resources Working Group, co‑led by Dr Saurabh Garg.
  • Attendees are invited to give feedback until 31 March.

3. Keynote Speech – Dr Saurabh Garg

3.1 Framing the Challenge

  • Compute as the Core Barrier – Access to GPUs, accelerators, and high‑performance clusters is the primary bottleneck for AI development worldwide.
  • Four PillarsCompute, Collaboration, Connectivity, Compliance & Context are identified as essential levers.

3.2 Vision of a Shared Compute Infrastructure

  • Public‑Good Model – Proposes treating compute as a shared, digital public good that can be modular, voluntary, and non‑binding.
  • METRI Platform – Introduced as a Multi‑Stakeholder AI for Trusted & Resilient Infrastructure digital public good that countries could adopt, customize, and extend.
  • Beyond Hardware – Emphasises the need for open‑source models, data governance, talent development, and institutional capacity.

3.3 Future‑Facing Questions

  • Raises the possibility of domain‑specific, lightweight models that could reduce compute demand, contrasting the current trend toward ever‑larger models.
  • Calls for rethinking compute‑heavy paradigms to make AI more inclusive.

4. Panel Discussion (Moderated by Andrew Sweet)

4.1 Governance of Compute as a Public Utility – Dr Saurabh Garg

  • Intelligent Prioritisation – Instead of outright rationing, compute should be allocated based on public‑interest priorities.
  • Philanthropic Role – Philanthropy can help de‑risk projects, unlock capital, and facilitate collaborations to make affordable compute widely available.

4.2 Moving Nations from Consumers to Co‑Creators – Martin Tisné

  • Current Concern – Risk of “white‑elephant” data centres that remain under‑utilised.
  • Two‑Fold Focus – (i) Data – Need for local, multilingual datasets; (ii) Open‑Source Ecosystem – Critical dependencies are under‑funded, and philanthropic funding is needed to sustain them.

4.3 Data Bottleneck & Stewardship – Martin Tisné (continued)

  • Highlights the lack of scalable data‑trust mechanisms and the necessity for privacy‑preserving data sharing.
  • Calls for significant resources to develop technical safeguards and governance frameworks.

4.4 South‑South Collaboration & Compute Demand Index – Dr Shikoh Gitau

  • Compute Demand Index – Quantifies GPU‑hour needs for Africa (≈ 2.5 M GPU‑hours/year; 7.5 M GPU‑hours over three years).
  • Investment‑Readiness Index – Assesses whether a country has the power, talent, data, and use‑cases to effectively consume compute.
  • Practical Example – Africa currently can provide only 5 % of its required GPU‑hours; partnerships with India (or other donors) must be needs‑based and use‑case‑driven.

4.5 Institutional Architecture for Catalytic Funding – Vilas Dhar

  • Argues for new institutional intermediaries (e.g., “Culpa Impact”) that can bridge governments, philanthropies, and private sector to align resources with public‑interest AI goals.
  • Stresses the need for co‑creation of AI stacks that are open, resilient, and locally adaptable.

4.6 Philanthropy Asia Alliance – Sean Xiao

  • Network of 80 members can coordinate shared compute resources across Asia (India, Indonesia, etc.).
  • Suggests aggregating demand to negotiate better cloud pricing and subsidising compute for impact‑driven startups.

4.7 Critical Reflections on Sovereignty & Interdependence – Andrew Sweet

  • Challenges the Westphalian notion of sovereignty (pure territorial control of hardware) and proposes a relational sovereignty focused on data stewardship and agency.
  • Calls for an open, collaborative global stack that respects privacy while providing choice and agency.

4.8 Final Remarks – Dr Saurabh Garg

  • Emphasises the need to extend frameworks beyond compute – encompassing models, talent, data, and governance for a comprehensive public‑interest AI ecosystem.

5. Closing & Announcements

  • The working report is now publicly available; feedback is requested by 31 March.
  • Kalpa Impact and other partners thanked for logistical support.
  • The session concludes with acknowledgements to all panelists and a reminder of the broader AI Summit agenda.

Key Takeaways

  • Compute is the new frontier of the digital divide; equitable access is essential for inclusive AI development.
  • India’s AI Mission (38 k GPUs) exemplifies a public‑interest compute ecosystem that can be replicated across the Global South.
  • The METRI platform is proposed as a modular, voluntary digital public good for shared compute infrastructure.
  • Catalytic philanthropy should focus on risk reduction, capital unlocking, and partnership convening to make affordable compute widely available.
  • South‑South collaborations must be use‑case‑driven; the Compute Demand Index (e.g., 2.5 M GPU‑hours/year for Africa) offers a concrete metric for partnership planning.
  • Open‑source dependencies are under‑funded; targeted philanthropic support is required to sustain critical components.
  • Data stewardship and privacy remain major bottlenecks; scalable data‑trust mechanisms are needed.
  • Institutional intermediaries (e.g., “Culpa Impact”) are crucial to connect governments, donors, and innovators for public‑interest AI outcomes.
  • Philanthropy Asia Alliance can aggregate demand to secure cheaper cloud compute for impact‑focused organisations.
  • A shift from territorial sovereignty to relational agency is needed to create an open, resilient global AI stack that balances privacy with collaborative innovation.

See Also: