The India AI Stack- Strategic Framework for National Growth and Pride

Abstract

The panel examined the “India AI Stack” – a five‑layer framework (applications, foundation models, chips, hardware, and energy) that underpins nation‑scale AI deployment across defence, health, geospatial services, and other critical sectors. Each panelist described how their domain (healthcare, academic research, military, state‑level geospatial governance, and industry hardware) is building sovereign, inclusive, and energy‑efficient AI solutions that respect India’s scale, diversity, and security constraints. The discussion highlighted concrete implementations (e.g., ICU‑predictive models, indigenised GIS tools, a home‑grown military LLM, neuromorphic chips) and identified immediate challenges such as data localisation, low‑resource model adaptation, edge‑computing metrics, and the need for federated learning. Audience questions probed practical roll‑outs in medicine, agriculture, and edge AI, prompting the panel to outline road‑maps for wider adoption and open‑source collaboration.

Detailed Summary

Moderator (Hriday Vikram) opened the session by celebrating the India AI Impact Summit, noting the Prime Minister’s commitment to positioning India as a global AI hub. He recited a modernised patriotic verse that linked “sovereign AI” with national pride and introduced the panelists, providing brief bios for each. He outlined the three‑part structure of the discussion:

  1. Initial 2‑minute position statements from each panelist on the strategic importance of the India AI Stack.
  2. Deeper thematic discussion on implementation experiences across the five stack layers.
  3. Audience Q & A covering health, defence, geospatial, hardware, and agricultural use‑cases.

2. Position Statements – “What the India AI Stack Means to Me”

2.1 Dr. Tavpritesh Sethi – Healthcare Perspective

  • Emphasised the mantra “solve for India, solve for the world” and highlighted the need for sovereignty, explainability, and inclusivity in health‑AI.
  • Cited the ABDM (Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission) as a foundational data‑interoperability framework that enables model development.
  • Described concrete projects:
    • ICU early‑warning models that predict neonatal sepsis or shock within 24 h.
    • Resolution‑transfer techniques that allow low‑density sensor data (common in resource‑constrained ICUs) to achieve accuracies comparable to high‑density setups.
      – Ongoing work in antimicrobial‑resistance research and drug‑discovery pipelines.

2.2 Dr. Manan Suri – Academic & Hardware R&D View

  • Stated that AI is an inflection point for India to shift from a service‑based economy to an AI‑OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) economy.
  • Reported two main contribution streams:
    1. Indigenised applications (geo‑AI, defence AI, computer‑vision solutions) now deployed in the field and running on NetApp hardware.
    2. R&D on next‑generation AI hardware – neuromorphic and brain‑inspired chips, with an expected product emergence ≈ 5 years from now.
  • Highlighted the “triad” of application developers, end‑users (e.g., the Army), and manufacturers sharing a single sovereign stack, underscoring the role of government policy.

2.3 Colonel Amit Mehna – Defence Imperative

  • Traced the Army’s journey from heavy reliance on foreign LLMs, GPUs, and open‑source stacks to the recognition (post‑Ops‑Indoor skirmish) that sovereign AI is mission‑critical.
  • Announced the launch of a 10‑billion‑parameter military‑specific LLM, built from scratch on exclusive defence data to eliminate bias and hallucinations.
  • Outlined a hardware diversification strategy:
    • Exploring CPU‑based “small LLMs” (SLMs) to reduce dependence on GPUs.
    • Building edge AI boxes with on‑board VLMs/YOLO models for real‑time battlefield analytics, thereby cutting bandwidth and latency.
  • Called for cross‑sector collaboration (industry, academia, startups) and invited participants to the Army’s exhibition stall.

2.4 Dr. Sultan Singh – State‑Level Geospatial Governance

  • Framed the Haryana initiative as a citizen‑centric sovereign AI platform, covering each individual from birth to end‑of‑life.
  • Described a state‑wide GIS ecosystem that offers parcel‑level satellite imagery, enabling governance, agriculture, water‑resource, and disaster‑management services.
  • Emphasised the massive computational demand (several terabytes per citizen) and the need for high‑performance infrastructure to deliver real‑time insights.

2.5 Swastik Jagrabarti (NetApp) – Industry & Infrastructure

  • Presented NetApp’s 25‑year legacy in high‑end computing and its role as a design‑partner of NVIDIA, giving early access to upcoming GPU architectures (H100, H200, B200/B300).
  • Introduced NBL‑4, a 2U rack‑mount server (4 CPUs, 8 B200 GPUs) that delivers high compute density while being tailored to Indian power‑grid realities.
  • Outlined edge‑AI deployments: compact AI boxes capable of running inference in remote villages, supporting public‑health applications and radiology workflows.
  • Stressed the “inclusive AI” agenda – hardware that can be placed in the most underserved corners of the country.

3. Deep‑Dive Discussion

3.1 Foundations & Customisation of Models

  • Dr. Sethi clarified that off‑the‑shelf foundation models do not directly translate to Indian settings because of linguistic diversity and low‑resource health infrastructure.
    • Example: a voice‑controlled drug‑stock monitoring tool that must understand regional dialects and operate with intermittent connectivity.
    • Highlighted work with ASHA workers, reducing redundant data entry across ~18 health apps through AI‑driven voice interfaces.
  • Federated learning was introduced as a solution for privacy‑preserving model updates across hospitals (AIMS, MAX) and states, particularly relevant under India’s DPDP (Data Protection) regime.

3.2 Sovereign Hardware & Energy Efficiency

  • Dr. Suri compared GPU power draw (≈ 300–2000 W per board) with the human brain’s ≈ 20 W consumption, arguing that neuromorphic computing can bridge the energy gap.
    • Emphasised India’s sustainability ethos: low‑power AI hardware reduces national electricity load and aligns with “green” manufacturing goals.
  • Swastik detailed the NVL‑4 liquid‑cooled platform (up to 80 GPUs per rack) and the CPU‑cluster inference that supports SLMs, demonstrating that both GPU‑heavy and CPU‑centric paths are being provisioned domestically.

3.3 Edge Deployment & Mission‑Critical Metrics

  • Colonel Mehna explained the edge‑AI architecture:
    • Centralised data‑centres host large LLMs for training; edge boxes run distilled models for latency‑sensitive tasks (e.g., real‑time object detection on UAV feeds).
    • Metrics for edge suitability go beyond generic accuracy/latency – they include domain‑specific decision reliability, bandwidth savings, and operational robustness under battlefield conditions.
  • Dr. Suri added that custom metrics (e.g., “mission‑critical recall”) are often required because standard industry scores may not align with defence or healthcare risk tolerances.

3.4 State‑Level Geospatial AI & Citizen Services

  • Dr. Singh illustrated the Haryana Spatial Application Center’s workflow:
    • Collect pixel‑level satellite data, process through AI pipelines, and push actionable insights (e.g., crop‑yield forecasts, flood risk alerts) to district officers and directly to farmers via mobile portals.
    • Noted the data volume: “one citizen may generate up to 4 TB of geospatial data”—necessitating high‑throughput compute that NetApp’s NVL‑4 can provide.

3.5 Public‑Health & Rural Outreach

  • Swastik highlighted a rural‑health AI pilot where a compact edge server installed at a primary health centre performs on‑device inference for diagnostic imaging and drug‑stock alerts, reducing dependence on unreliable internet back‑haul.

4. Audience Q & A

Question (summarised)Speaker(s)Key Points
How are foundation models adapted for Indian languages and low‑resource health settings?Dr. SethiNeed for localised training data, dialect‑aware voice interfaces, and transfer‑learning to operate with sparse sensor streams.
What is the timeline for neuromorphic hardware to become a market product?Dr. SuriPrototype stage completed, ≈ 5 years to commercial‑ready chips; focus on energy‑efficient inference.
Is a sovereign AI stack non‑negotiable for the Army?Colonel MehnaAbsolutely, citing risk of foreign‑vendor supply‑chain failures; therefore building indigenous LLMs, CPU‑based SLMs, and edge boxes.
Why can’t existing international GIS software serve India’s needs?Dr. SinghInternational tools lack granular Indian topography, citizen‑level data, and policy‑aligned analytics; only an India‑specific stack can respect local variability.
What is the current hardware readiness for edge‑to‑core AI?SwastikNVL‑4 (80‑GPU racks), B200/B300 servers, CPU inference clusters, all manufactured in Faridabad, with edge‑to‑core connectivity (speculative decoding) already in field trials.
How is federated learning being used in healthcare?Dr. SethiPilots linking AIMS, MAX, CDAC hospitals via federated AI to improve models while keeping patient data local, complying with DPDP.
What metrics determine whether an AI workload belongs on the edge?Colonel MehnaDecision‑time latency, bandwidth savings, mission‑critical recall, and robustness to intermittent power.
Will farmers directly use AI tools for crop monitoring?Dr. Manan (via discussion)Current solutions are state‑mediated (data collected centrally, insights disseminated to farmers). Direct farmer use depends on cost of sensors, internet access, and economics of scale – expected to improve as precision‑agri platforms mature.

5. Closing Remarks

The moderator thanked the panel for demonstrating concrete progress across the five AI‑stack layers and for showcasing how government, academia, defence, and industry are co‑creating a sovereign AI ecosystem. Attendees were invited to visit the various exhibition stalls (Hall 4 for NetApp, the Army, Haryana Space Application Center) to see live demos. The session was wrapped up with a collective applause for the contributors and a reminder that the India AI Mission aims to scale these efforts nationally by 2026.

Key Takeaways

  • Sovereignty is non‑negotiable for strategic sectors (defence, health, governance); India is building home‑grown models, chips, and edge devices to eliminate foreign‑dependency.
  • Inclusive AI must accommodate linguistic diversity and low‑resource environments, exemplified by ICU‑predictive models and voice‑based health‑stock tools.
  • India‑manufactured hardware (NVL‑4, B200/B300, NBL‑4) is now liquid‑cooled, high‑density, and locally assembled, enabling both data‑centre scale training and edge inference.
  • Neuromorphic and brain‑inspired chips are being researched to close the energy‑efficiency gap between GPUs (hundreds of watts) and the human brain (~20 W), with commercial products anticipated in ≈ 5 years.
  • Edge‑AI deployment is critical for time‑sensitive missions (battlefield decision loops, rural health diagnostics) and for reducing bandwidth; custom mission‑specific metrics guide placement decisions.
  • State‑level geospatial AI (Haryana) demonstrates how a sovereign stack can deliver citizen‑centric services from agriculture to disaster response, but demands massive compute and large‑scale data pipelines.
  • Federated learning is emerging as a solution for privacy‑preserving model updates in healthcare, aligning with India’s DPDP data‑protection framework.
  • Agricultural AI is feasible at scale via state‑run satellite analytics, yet direct farmer adoption hinges on lowering sensor and processing costs.
  • The panel underscored the need for continuous multi‑stakeholder collaboration (army, academia, industry, state governments) to sustain the momentum of the India AI Stack.

Prepared from the verbatim transcript of the India AI Stack panel at the India AI Impact Summit, Delhi, 2026.

See Also: