AI & Arthik Shakti: A Blueprint for Women led Prosperity

Detailed Summary

The opening speaker (unnamed, likely a conference host) welcomed the audience in Hindi, emphasizing the five‑day AI Summit’s goal to shape “positive, inclusive AI” for economic empowerment.

• Stressed that AI is not just a technological tool but a catalyst for human capability and women’s economic agency.
• Highlighted the need to move from “women‑empowerment” to participation, leadership, and ownership in AI‑driven economies.
• Acknowledged challenges such as digital divide, skill gaps, and access barriers, calling for an “inclusive ecosystem” that reaches urban, rural, and entrepreneurial women alike.

2. Introduction of the Panel & Moderator

Speaker	Role in the Session
Mihoko Kumamoto	Moderator – introduced the panel and framed the key question about women’s economic agency in an AI‑centric India.
Vijaya Rahatkar	Panelist – Chair, National Commission for Women.
Atsuko Okuda	Panelist – ITU representative (previously gave an overview of ITU standards).
Brijesh Singh	Panelist – AI & Cyber‑Security specialist, Government of Maharashtra.
Kartik Shah	Panelist – AI artist, founder of Maati Baani.

The moderator noted the importance of having male voices on a women‑focused panel, a point underscored by Brijesh Singh’s participation.

3. Core Themes Discussed

3.1 AI Standards as Building Blocks

• Atsuko Okuda explained that ≈500 AI standards are either finalized or in development, serving as reusable “building blocks” for entrepreneurs, researchers, and businesses.
• Emphasised that women can contribute to standard‑setting or leverage standards to launch AI‑enabled ventures (e.g., in agriculture, health).
• Called the availability of standards “good news for women” because they reduce the need to start from scratch.

3.2 Inclusive Skilling & Capacity Building

• Vijaya Rahatkar outlined two priority tracks:
  1. Inclusive skilling – market‑relevant AI training for women across rural‑urban divides, with programs like Stand‑Up India and Startup India that already show >70 % women participation.
  2. Entrepreneurship enablement – mentorship, networking platforms, and digital marketplaces to convert skills into sustainable businesses.
• Cited the “E‑Shoda AI” initiative that has trained hundreds of thousands of women (Anganwadi workers, ASHAs) on AI‑enabled services.
• Highlighted a policy‑dialogue approach: partnering with state women’s commissions, NGOs, and private sector to ensure women are both producers and decision‑makers in AI ecosystems.

3.3 Addressing the Gender Digital Divide

• Mihoko Kumamoto reiterated the persistent gender‑digital gap and argued AI can be a lever to close it—provided access, literacy, and device availability are tackled concurrently.
• Mentioned UN‑UNITAR’s work with industry, academia, and UN agencies to roll out rapid AI services to underserved populations.

3.4 AI Bias, Ethics, and Deep‑Fake Threats

• Brijesh Singh warned of systemic bias in AI models built on male‑dominated data (Reddit, Wikipedia).
• Shared alarming statistics: ≈91 % of deep‑fake victims are women; AI‑generated content can amplify harassment (revenge‑porn, defamation).
• Cited case study from Maharashtra: women‑led Self‑Help Groups achieved ~100 % loan repayment when provided with micro‑credit, illustrating that gender‑biased financial algorithms (which rely on land‑ownership collateral) unfairly exclude women.

3.5 Cyber‑Security & Online Safety for Women

• Brijesh Singh identified the top safety gap as platform responsibility—the current “safe‑harbor” regime (Section 230) shields platforms from liability.
• Proposed concrete remedies:
  • Mandatory watermarking of AI‑generated images to flag deep‑fakes.
  • Stricter intermediary rules (India’s 2021 framework) with fast‑track takedown, evidence preservation, and law‑enforcement cooperation.
  • Age‑based social‑media restrictions (e.g., Australia’s ban for under‑16) as a model for India.

3.6 AI in the Creative Sector – Opportunities & New Barriers

• Kartik Shah described how AI accelerates artistic workflows:
  • Reduces procrastination by auto‑generating drafts, captions, lip‑sync, and multilingual subtitles.
  • Enables global reach for folk musicians (Kutch, Rajasthan) via instant translation into 15+ languages.
• Highlighted gray areas:
  • Authorship concerns when AI can compose millions of songs daily, potentially eclipsing human creators.
  • Sampling & copyright infringement – AI may stitch together fragments from dozens of works, making provenance tracking difficult.
  • Perception bias – AI often defaults to gendered stereotypes (e.g., suggesting “doctor” for men, “nurse” for women).
• Called for grassroots AI literacy programs and curriculum integration so that future creators can harness AI responsibly.

3.7 Policy & Governance Recommendations

• Atsuko Okuda reaffirmed the need for inclusive AI standards and highlighted the ITU Innovation Center in Delhi as a hub for women innovators.
• Vijaya Rahatkar advocated for a structured, measurable roadmap: clear milestones, accountability mechanisms, and continuous evaluation rather than slogans.
• Consensus across panelists: multi‑stakeholder collaboration (government, private sector, academia, civil society) is essential to convert dialogue into a real blueprint.

4. Audience Q&A (Key Exchanges)

Questioner	Topic	Summary of Response
Audience (generic)	Misuse of AI / Deep‑fakes	Panel stressed platform responsibility, watermarking, and stricter safe‑harbor laws.
Audience	Cyber‑security risks for women‑led businesses	Brijesh highlighted AI‑enabled fraud, phishing, and the need for robust data‑protection education.
Audience	AI’s impact on creative ownership	Kartik explained the double‑edged nature of AI – speed vs. authorship dilution; called for legal frameworks to trace AI‑generated content.
Audience	Measuring effectiveness of women‑focused AI programs	Vijaya described existing metrics (loan‑repayment rates, adoption of AI tools by Anganwadi workers) and the need for more granular impact data.

Time constraints limited further questions; participants were invited to approach panelists after the session.

5. Closing Remarks

• Vijaya Rahatkar delivered a passionate concluding statement (in Hindi) emphasizing that AI‑driven prosperity will only succeed if women are placed at the forefront as coders, policymakers, innovators, and owners.
• Called for systemic support—training, infrastructure, policy, and ecosystem collaboration—to move from “participation” to “ownership.”
• Reiterated that inclusive AI is not a slogan but a concrete, measurable pathway toward equitable, sustainable growth for India and the Global South.

Key Takeaways

• AI standards are now abundant (~500 in development) and act as reusable foundations for women‑led startups; active participation in standard‑setting is encouraged.
• Inclusive skilling (market‑relevant AI training) and entrepreneurship enablement (mentor networks, digital marketplaces) are the two pillars identified for expanding women’s economic agency.
• Gender‑digital divide remains a critical barrier; addressing device access, literacy, and connectivity is essential before AI benefits can be realized.
• Systemic bias in AI—from data sources to algorithmic outputs—continues to disadvantage women (e.g., deep‑fakes, occupational stereotyping); explicit bias‑ mitigation strategies are required.
• Cyber‑security and platform responsibility are top safety concerns; proposals include mandatory AI‑generated content watermarking and revisiting safe‑harbor protections.
• In the creative sector, AI accelerates production and global reach but raises new questions about authorship, copyright, and algorithmic bias; grassroots AI education is needed.
• Policy recommendations: develop a measurable blueprint with milestones, accountability, and continuous evaluation; foster a multi‑stakeholder ecosystem (government, UN agencies, private sector, civil society).
• Women’s economic empowerment through AI is framed as a systemic shift—from being merely “empowered” to becoming owners, leaders, and decision‑makers in AI‑driven economies.
• Collaboration is key: the session stressed that sustainable prosperity will emerge only when all stakeholders jointly build inclusive AI infrastructures and carefully monitor impact.

---

See Also:

• women-in-climate-and-ai-bridging-the-gender-gap-in-innovation
• building-indias-ai-governance-architecture-from-frameworks-to-implementation
• empowering-the-human-edge-building-a-future-ready-workforce-in-the-age-of-ai
• unlocking-ais-potential-for-agricultural-innovation-and-dpi-enabled-economic-growth
• ai-beyond-moonshots-a-playbook-for-many
• mahaai-building-safe-secure-and-smart-governance
• ai-for-fraud-prevention-and-financial-inclusion-in-bfsi
• ai-for-industries-resilience-innovation-and-efficiency
• shaping-the-ai-narrative-trust-outcomes-and-responsibility
• policies-for-social-and-economic-resilience-in-the-ai-age-global-south-perspectives