Culture and Code: Creative AI for Equitable Development

Abstract

The panel explored how artificial intelligence can democratize creativity while safeguarding cultural diversity, authenticity, and ethical use. Two core “tensions” guided the conversation: (1) whether AI will flatten cultural expression into a homogeneous “least‑common‑denominator” output, and (2) whether AI will truly broaden access to creative practice or merely become another data‑harvesting apparatus. Panelists debated historical roots of cultural sameness, the role of funders and governance, the importance of play, unpredictability, and embodied human experience, and concluded with a rapid‑fire exercise on what each would be willing to surrender to AI.

Detailed Summary

• Purpose: Set the stage for a discussion on “creativity + AI”.
• Key Points:
  • Creativity was innate in childhood; later it required mastery of tools and skills.
  • AI promises to supply new tools that could re‑enable innate creativity.
  • Two “tensions” introduced:
    1. Cultural Flatness – Might AI reduce artistic output to a least‑common‑denominator?
    2. Access vs. Exploitation – Will AI open creative doors for everyone, or will it become a new conduit for data extraction?

2. Introducing the Panelists (Moderator)

Panelist	Brief Intro
Siok Siok Tan	Documentary filmmaker, writer, author of a book on AI & humanity; works across Singapore, SE Asia, China.
Prof. Olivier Oullier	Human‑centred AI specialist; also a musician who translates brain‑waves into music, enables physically‑limited people to control complex systems (e.g., F1‑car simulators).
Vilas Dhar	Philanthropist heading large AI‑focused foundations; champions AI as a tool for dignity, equity, and mass democratization.
Shekhar Kapur	Oscar‑nominated director; longtime storyteller from the Indian film industry.
Siok Siok Tan (re‑mentioned)	(Note: the transcript repeats her name; the moderator calls her “Suk Suk Tan”).

3. Tension 1 – Will AI Produce Cultural Flatness?

3.1. Vilas Dhar’s Perspective

• Historical Context: Cultural sameness is not a product of AI but of colonial oppression, globalisation, and power structures that have historically homogenised knowledge.
• AI as a Mirror: The algorithms we build embed existing cultural biases; if we train on Western‑centric data, we risk perpetuating the same dominance.
• Opportunity for Diversity: AI can be grounded in community data (e.g., Quechua poetry) to surface otherwise invisible cultural expressions.
• Algorithmic Design: Current recommendation systems prioritize mass‑appeal content; we need algorithms that uplift eccentricity and minority voices.
• Conclusion: Democratization is possible, but it requires intentional design and governance; “it is not inevitable”.

3.2. Shekhar Kapur’s Interjection

• Playful Challenge: He questions whether AI will “turn storytelling into a formula”.
• Childhood Analogy: Emphasises play as the core of creativity—unpredictable, exploratory, and resistant to formulaic output.
• Human Inertia: Argues that predictability (e.g., binge‑watching the same series) makes us vulnerable to AI‑driven homogenisation.

3.3. Olivier Oullier’s Contribution

• Beyond the Brain: Stresses that human experience is embodied (facial expressions, gestures, collective history) and cannot be reduced to text alone.
• World‑Models vs. Large‑Language‑Models: Calls for AI that learns from multimodal, lived experiences rather than only language data.
• Ethical Guardrails: Suggests that AI should be treated as a tool, not a surveillance apparatus, provided we set proper guardrails.

3.4. Siok Siok Tan’s View

• Friction vs. Frictionless Generation: Highlights that meaning‑making, not just content production, is the essential human act.
• Algorithmic Amplification: Warns that if we let “least‑resistance” algorithms dominate, unheard voices stay buried.
• Intentional Co‑Creation: Calls for human‑guided shaping of algorithms to amplify marginal narratives and preserve cultural texture.

4. Tension 2 – Will AI Broaden Access or Become a Data‑Harvesting Tool?

4.1. Olivier Oullier (Expanded)

• Technology as Enabler: Draws parallels with historic inventions (camera, violin) that expanded artistic possibilities.
• Data‑Rich Human Models: Argues that AI must ingest richer signals (brain waves, facial expression, physiology) to respect the full human spectrum.
• Ethical Priority: Emphasises outcomes (inclusion, dignity) over the purity of the tool itself.

4.2. Vilas Dhar (Follow‑up)

• Power Asymmetry: Acknowledges that a few corporations and nation‑states currently hold AI capability, creating surveillance risk.
• Intentionality & Literacy: Advocates for AI literacy: users should be aware of what data they surrender and what they receive.

4.3. Shekhar Kapur (Storytelling Example)

• Privacy vs. Surveillance Analogy: Shares a “Secret” installation where participants anonymously type a secret and receive another’s secret—illustrates a privacy‑first interaction with a machine.
• Human‑Machine Intimacy: Argues that people are comfortable sharing personal feelings with humans, but reluctant to expose the same to a machine, highlighting a gap in trust.

4.4. Siok Siok Tan (Community‑Centric Take)

• Democratization at the Bottom: Stresses that need‑driven AI adoption by people at the “bottom of the pyramid” drives real democratization (e.g., a cleaning lady learning prompting to feed her family).
• Intuition & Play: Positions intuition and playfulness as essential drivers that AI should complement, not replace.

5. Rapid‑Fire Closing Question – “What is one thing you would gladly give over to AI?”

Panelist	Answer (summarised)
Shekhar Kapur	Education for mass‑market Indian learners – AI could replace costly coaching classes and democratise certification.
Siok Siok Tan	Fighting over money – an AI negotiator/mediator to handle disputes.
Vilas Dhar	Health & healthcare – AI solutions that can be deployed quickly to save lives, provided they are ethical and legally sound.
Olivier Oullier	Education (re‑iterated) – AI‑driven learning tools for children.
Moderator (Jaya Deshmukh)	None – Wants to retain humanity, playfulness, and the ability to argue; only willing to let AI assist, not replace core human experiences.

The rapid‑fire segment highlighted a spectrum of willingness: from systemic services (education, health) to personal negotiation, to a conservative stance that preserves human agency.

6. Closing Remarks

• The moderator thanked the audience, invited everyone for a group selfie, and underscored the need to stay unpredictable and playful in the AI era.

Key Takeaways

• Cultural sameness is a pre‑AI problem. It stems from historical power dynamics; AI can either amplify existing biases or, if deliberately designed, surface marginalized cultures.
• AI democratization requires intentional governance. Funders, policymakers, and technologists must reward diversity and protect against the “least‑common‑denominator” effect.
• Creativity hinges on play and unpredictability. Human intuition, embodied experience, and the willingness to embrace uncertainty are essential safeguards against formulaic AI output.
• Multimodal, world‑model AI (incorporating brain‑waves, gestures, physiology) is needed to capture the full richness of human creativity beyond text.
• Power asymmetry is real. A handful of corporations and nation‑states control AI infrastructure, making surveillance concerns legitimate; transparency and AI literacy can mitigate misuse.
• Edge‑of‑the‑pyramid adoption matters. When AI tools are learned by those with the greatest need (e.g., a cleaning‑lady learning prompting), they can truly level the playing field.
• Rapid‑fire insights: Panelists see education and health as the most impactful domains for AI hand‑over, while others prefer to keep core human experiences (argument, play, personal agency) intact.
• Future direction: AI should be built as a partner to human creativity, not as a replacement; co‑creation, community‑grounded data, and responsible design are the pillars for equitable development.

---

See Also:

• ai-x-creativity-skilling-for-innovation-in-the-intelligent-economy
• keynote-i-to-the-power-of-ai-an-8-year-old-on-aspiring-india-impacting-the-world
• ai-for-democracy-reimagining-governance-in-the-age-of-intelligence
• toward-collective-action-a-roundtable-on-safe-and-trusted-ai
• thriving-with-ai-human-potential-skills-and-opportunity
• empowering-the-human-edge-building-a-future-ready-workforce-in-the-age-of-ai
• empowering-people-in-the-age-of-ai-germanasian-partnerships-for-talent-innovation-and-the-future-of-work
• from-promising-pilots-to-system-shifts-what-it-really-takes-to-scale-responsible-ai-in-education