India AI Impact Summit 2026

from-vision-to-action-scaling-equitable-ai-advisory-systems-through-agx-ai

6 min read

TRACK:Inclusion for Social Empowerment
SPEAKERS
  • Mr. David Bergvinson, DevGlobal
  • Mr. Michael Minkoff, Athena Infonomics
  • Ms. Julianna Drinan, Gates Foundation
  • Ms. Sophie Barrowman, DevGlobal
SESSION OVERVIEW

This interactive session convenes leaders advancing AI advisory systems in agriculture to explore AGX AI as a growing community of practice focused on responsibly scaling AI for small-scale producers. Drawing on work in benchmarking, data corpus development, and model approaches, the session highlights emerging learning priorities, key collaboration needs, and opportunities for participants to help shape the next phase of shared learning across regions and sectors.

VIDEO RECORDING

From Vision to Action: Scaling Equitable AI Advisory Systems Through AGX AI

Abstract

The session brought together practitioners working at the intersection of artificial intelligence and small‑holder agriculture to examine how the AGX AI community of practice can responsibly scale AI‑driven advisory services. Speakers outlined the “eight‑pillar” framework (data, models, benchmarking, localization, farmer data, delivery, equitable access, policy) and introduced a draft learning agenda intended to harmonise terminology, standards, and evaluation approaches across regions. Attendees then broke into small groups to critique the agenda, surface gaps, and suggest additional priorities, with the aim of shaping the next phase of shared learning and coordinated action for equitable AI deployment in agriculture.

Detailed Summary

  • David Bergvinson opened the session by emphasizing the need for AI advisory systems that are inclusive, trustworthy, locally grounded and aligned with the everyday realities of small‑scale farmers.
  • He outlined the four‑layer architecture needed for scaling:
    1. Agricultural‑specific data & benchmarks – curated, high‑quality datasets that reflect local contexts.
    2. Access layers & policy – shared infrastructure and governance frameworks.
    3. Comprehensive mapping of innovation opportunities across these layers.
  • AGX AI was introduced as a collaborative initiative that brings together researchers, implementers, technology providers, and agricultural stakeholders to develop coordinated, responsibility‑based AI advisory services.

2. The Eight‑Pillar Framework

David enumerated eight inter‑related pillars that together define the scope of AGX AI:

PillarCore FocusKey Issues Highlighted
1. Data (Context‑relevant & multilingual)Build corpora that capture local agro‑ecological conditions and minor languages.Need for data that reflects linguistic diversity; incentives for data sharing.
2. ModelsDeploy frontier models that can handle minor languages and localized advice.Challenge of adapting large‑scale models to local contexts; importance of testing.
3. BenchmarkingSet standards for evaluating model accuracy, relevance, and impact.Defining the “rules” for testing; aligning benchmarks with farmer needs.
4. LocalizationTailor advice to gender, market, and regional differences.Ensuring relevance for both women and men farmers; capturing market nuances.
5. Farmer Data (Trust & Benefit Sharing)Manage sensitive farmer‑generated data responsibly.Building trust, ensuring benefits flow back to data providers.
6. Delivery & Private‑Sector EngagementLeverage private‑sector capacities for sustainable solutions.Coordinating large and local organisations; ensuring equitable reach.
7. Equitable Access & InclusionGuarantee that AI services reach underserved markets.Addressing infrastructure gaps, especially in African contexts.
8. Policy & Enabling EnvironmentCreate regulatory frameworks that support responsible AI use.Learning from India’s digital public infrastructure (e.g., Aadhaar) and adapting lessons.

3. Introduction of the Learning Agenda

  • Michael Minkoff took over to present the draft learning agenda, framing it as a shared learning infrastructure for the AGX AI community.
  • He stressed that the agenda is version 1.0 – a working draft intended to be refined through collective input.
  • Participants were asked to scan a QR code (or use printed handouts) to access the agenda and break into groups of 5–10 for a 15–20‑minute discussion.

3.1 Objectives of the Learning Agenda

  1. Standardise terminology across data, benchmarking, models, and policy.
  2. Facilitate cross‑regional coordination (Nigeria, South India, Nairobi, etc.).
  3. Accelerate learning from pilots to comparable evidence, informing better benchmarks, data standards, and safeguards.
  4. Identify gaps in the eight‑pillar framework and propose additional thematic elements.

4. Break‑out Group Activity

  • Facilitation: Michael reminded attendees of the discussion prompts:

    1. Missing thematic elements or pillars?
    2. Are the questions within each pillar (data corpus, localization, benchmarking, etc.) appropriately scoped?
    3. What experiences or evidence should be incorporated?
    4. How can we better link technical performance to policy and equitable access?

  • Process:

    • Groups received note sheets (and paper copies of the agenda for low‑connectivity participants).
    • Over ~15 minutes they brainstormed, noting perceived gaps, suggested new pillars, and flagged practical challenges.
    • Facilitators (David, Michael, and available co‑moderators) circulated to answer questions and keep discussion on track.

5. Emerging Insights from the Discussion

ThemeKey Points Raised by Participants
Data Corpus & Incentives• Need robust incentive mechanisms for farmers and private data providers to contribute data.
• Suggest federated data models that combine static (e.g., soil maps) and dynamic (e.g., market prices) sources.
• Highlight the challenge of language tagging for minor languages.
Benchmarking Standards• Call for dual‑layer benchmarks: technical performance and farmer‑experience impact.
• Propose open‑source evaluation kits to enable reproducibility across regions.
• Emphasise the importance of transparent scoring for policy makers.
Localization & Gender Sensitivity• Stress that advice must be gender‑responsive, reflecting different labour patterns and market access.
• Suggest integration of local market intelligence to improve relevance.
Farmer Data Trust• Highlight the need for clear data‑ownership contracts and benefit‑sharing models (e.g., micro‑payments for data use).
Delivery & Private‑Sector Role• Discuss public‑private partnership (PPP) models that balance scaling speed with equitable service provision.
• Raise concerns about digital divide—private firms may focus on high‑profit regions unless guided by policy.
Equitable Access & Infrastructure• Identify connectivity gaps in remote African regions as a barrier to AI‑driven advisory tools.
• Suggest leveraging existing public digital infrastructure (e.g., mobile money platforms).
Policy & Governance• Point to India’s Aadhaar‑style digital IDs as a possible model for farmer identification, but note privacy implications.
• Argue for regional policy sandboxes to test AI regulations before national rollout.
Additional Pillars Proposed• Capacity‑building – systematic training for extension agents and farmer leaders on AI tools.
• Sustainability & Financing – mechanisms for long‑term funding of AI advisory services.

6. Clarifications & Follow‑Up Actions

  • Michael reiterated that the learning agenda draft will be updated based on today’s feedback and circulated for a second round of review.
  • David offered to be a point of contact for any further questions about the eight‑pillar framework or data‑sharing mechanisms.
  • Facilitators invited participants to remain at the venue for a brief networking period and to join a later session (1 pm) that will dive deeper into the policy‑benchmarking linkage.

7. Closing Remarks

  • The session concluded with a thank‑you from the moderators, acknowledging the high level of engagement and the value of collective expertise in shaping a responsible, equitable AI advisory ecosystem for small‑scale producers.

Key Takeaways

  • Eight‑pillar framework (data, models, benchmarking, localization, farmer data, delivery, equitable access, policy) is the foundational structure for scaling AI advisory systems.
  • Inclusive, trustworthy, locally grounded AI requires coordinated infrastructure, shared standards, and robust governance.
  • Learning agenda aims to harmonise language, standards, and evaluation across regions; it is a living document that will be refined through community input.
  • Data incentives and federated corpora are critical to gathering high‑quality, multilingual datasets while respecting farmer ownership.
  • Benchmarking must assess both technical accuracy and real‑world impact, with transparent scoring to inform policy.
  • Gender‑responsive localization and benefit‑sharing mechanisms are essential for building farmer trust.
  • Public‑private partnerships should be structured to ensure equitable access, especially in low‑connectivity regions.
  • Policy lessons from India’s digital ID system can guide governance, but privacy and contextual adaptation are necessary.
  • Additional priorities identified: capacity‑building for extension agents and sustainable financing models for long‑term AI advisory services.
  • The session’s participatory breakout generated concrete feedback that will be incorporated into the next iteration of the AGX AI learning agenda, ensuring that the community co‑creates the roadmap for equitable AI deployment in agriculture.

See Also:

Graph View