From Models to the Masses: Deploying AI for Climate Resilience
Abstract
The session examined how cutting‑edge AI and geospatial modelling can be turned into usable tools for climate‑resilient planning at the hyper‑local scale. After a quick demo of a new “climate‑resilience atlas” platform, presenters highlighted AI‑driven use‑cases for agriculture and urban water management. A moderated panel then explored two thematic pillars – disaster‑risk modelling and digital public infrastructure – before fielding audience questions on data localisation, sovereignty, capacity‑building and affordability for small‑holder farmers. The event closed with a Google keynote that showcased concrete AI forecasts for monsoon timing and flood alerts, quantifying health‑ and cost‑savings for vulnerable communities.
Detailed Summary
| Speaker | Core points |
|---|---|
| Reva (CEEW) | Described the CVI (Climate Vulnerability Index, 2021) and subsequent sub‑district monsoon‑pattern and heat‑index studies. Noted that the council is drafting 300 city‑level action plans and hosting the South‑Asia hub of the Global Heat Network. |
| Ashley Thomas | Framed the data problem: climate data are large, siloed, and fragmented; risk models sit on GitHub but are inaccessible to decision‑makers. Introduced a single, modular platform that (a) ingests climate and sectoral layers (e.g., power, agriculture, data‑center footprints), (b) delivers an API‑first, interoperable service, and (c) offers visual dashboards, downloadable tables/charts, and a conversational climate agent that can understand natural‑language queries in national languages. |
| Reva (continued) | Showcased a geospatial AI extension that drills from district‑level risk down to building‑level exposure, enabling precise adaptation interventions. Announced that QR‑codes would be displayed at the end of the session to give attendees early‑beta access. |
Key announcement – the Climate‑Resilience Atlas will be released as a digital public good later in the year.
2. AI for Agriculture – From Plot‑Level Sensing to Policy‑Scale Impact
| Speaker | Core points |
|---|---|
| Banashree Thapa (CEEW) | Highlighted data gaps in India’s agriculture: reliance on aggregated census, surveys, and crop‑cutting experiments; the need for real‑time, plot‑level insights. |
| Reva (continued) | Described the dominance of rice‑wheat‑sugarcane (≈45 % of cropped area) and the resulting fertiliser subsidy waste. Explained two bottlenecks limiting crop‑diversification incentives: 1. Insufficient monetary incentive for farmers to move away from rice. 2. Trust deficits – delayed payments and fraudulent beneficiary claims erode confidence on both farmer and policymaker sides. |
| Illustrative AI use‑cases | • Google‑AI‑MED & AMNIC – satellite‑based phenology detection that triggers automatic payment releases as crops progress through growth stages, eliminating on‑ground verification delays. • Google ALU (Land‑Use Classification) – AI that distinguishes agricultural, urban, and other land‑covers, enabling targeted beneficiary identification for diversification schemes. |
| Take‑away | The tools can close the data‑to‑policy loop, allowing governments to pilot, monitor, and scale diversification programmes with minimal manual overhead. |
3. Panel Introduction (Moderated by Dr Arunabha Ghosh)
- Moderator: Dr Arunabha Ghosh (CEEW) welcomed the audience and framed the session’s purpose – moving AI from “research labs” to actionable, trusted intelligence for governments, communities, and markets.
- Panelists introduced:
- Prof Manabendra Saharia (IIT Delhi) – flood risk & geospatial science.
- Ashley Thomas (Google) – AI‑for‑climate‑impact acceleration.
- Dr Ram Prasath Manohar V (BWSSB) – urban water & sewerage AI applications.
- Kay McGowan (Digital Impact Alliance) – digital public infrastructure (DPI) and governance.
4. Disaster‑Management & Impact Assessment (Prof Manabendra Saharia)
| Theme | Highlights |
|---|---|
| Disaster‑management | AI models now cover floods, landslides, storm surges, coastal risk. 5‑year trend: shift from research‑only to commercial interest (e.g., Google). Large‑scale models (national landslide, flood) are being integrated with government systems. |
| Impact Assessment | Traditional work stopped at hazard forecasts. New geospatial AI enables large‑scale impact modelling – e.g., estimating building damage, dam or bridge risk downstream. This expands the scope from site‑specific to regional assessments. |
| Future outlook | Expectation of greater government adoption, especially as AI‑driven risk layers become embedded in planning tools. |
5. Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) – Data Scarcity & Equity (Kay McGowan)
| Point | Detail |
|---|---|
| Maturity Gap | DPI is still scaling; early efforts focused on identity & payments (Aadhaar‑type IDs, cash transfers). Climate‑specific use‑cases are nascent. |
| Hyper‑local Geospatial Data Gap | Urban mapping lags behind rapid demographic shifts; many cities lack up‑to‑date parcel‑level data. Satellite refreshes are expensive; public‑sector budgets often insufficient. |
| Business‑Model Innovation | Proposes treating geospatial data as a public‑good rail on which private innovation can run, funded through sustainable models (e.g., subscription for updates, public‑private partnerships). |
| Layered Equity Lens | Mapping must incorporate economic activity, vulnerability, adaptive capacity (e.g., shanty‑town vs. formal housing) to be useful for disaster response. |
| Link to Council work | CEEW’s neighbourhood flood‑mapping pilots illustrate how risk + socio‑economic layers produce actionable insights. |
6. AI‑Enabled Water & Sewerage Management (Dr Ram Prasath Manohar V)
| Component | Summary |
|---|---|
| IoT‑sensor network | > 78 pumping stations now fitted with AI‑enabled sensors; > 3,000 bore‑well sensors installed city‑wide. |
| Predictive analytics | AI predicts pump efficiency, maintenance needs, and groundwater depletion trends up to 2025, allowing pre‑emptive water‑allocation and groundwater‑recharge planning. |
| Operational gains | The AI‑driven sewage‑treatment management system has cut operational costs by > 20 %, saving roughly ₹1,000 crore / yr. |
| Capacity‑building | Staff are being trained to interpret AI dashboards; the system is positioned as a decision‑support tool, not an autonomous controller. |
| Citizen‑facing extension | Plans to roll out smart‑meter‑type apps for households to monitor personal water use and respond to alerts. |
7. Audience Q&A – Localization, Sovereignty, Capacity, & Affordability
| Question | Main responses |
|---|---|
| How does Google ensure global models respect local nuance? | Ashley Thomas explained a two‑track approach: (1) open‑access model for partners to overlay proprietary local data; (2) co‑development with organisations like CEEW to fine‑tune datasets (e.g., weather, crop‑type). Emphasised reliance on public data (e.g., aerosol datasets) and continuous partner feedback. |
| Why is data sovereignty crucial for climate AI? | Prof Saharia argued AI is becoming a national operating system; renting models from abroad risks loss of strategic control. Governance, security, and indigenous capacity (training students, retaining talent) are essential. |
| What about the scarcity of high‑resolution satellite / land‑use data? | Kay McGowan noted most high‑resolution imagery is private; building a public rail for regularly refreshed, affordable geodata is a priority. |
| Capacity gaps in government (analytics, interpretation, actionability) | Dr Manohar underscored the need for human‑in‑the‑loop training, aligning AI outputs with existing operational SOPs, and extending awareness to citizens. |
| Affordability for small‑holder farmers & lack of digitised land records | Ashley Thomas pointed to free AI‑based tools (e.g., agri‑rubro.com) and government‑backed pilots that bypass full land‑digitisation by using satellite‑derived proxies. Kay McGowan added that political will, not technology, is the main blocker for comprehensive cadastre digitisation. |
| Quick follow‑up – “Is AI possible without robust land‑digitisation?” – Panel consensus: Yes, but impact will be limited; pilots can demonstrate value to spur investment in digitisation. |
8. Keynote – AI for Agriculture Forecasts & Flood Management (Rajroshan Sawhney)
| Topic | Highlights |
|---|---|
| Mission Lawson (India) – AI/ML for environmental prediction. | |
| Neural‑GCN model – hybrid physics‑ML system that predicted early‑onset monsoon in Kerala (2023) and warned against premature sowing. Impact: prevented costly seed/fertiliser loss for millions of farmers. | |
| Flood‑alert pilot in Bihar (with Yale Economic Growth Center) – AI‑driven early warnings distributed to households. Measured outcomes: • 35 % reduction in health‑care spend on illness; • 9 % reduction in injury‑related expenses; • 36 saved per $1 spent on alert dissemination. | |
| Message – AI is not a luxury; it yields measurable public‑health and economic returns when coupled with strong institutional channels. | |
| Call to action – Emphasised continued partnerships across government, academia, NGOs, and the private sector to turn models into mass‑adopted tools. |
Key Takeaways
- Unified platform needed – The Climate‑Resilience Atlas demonstrates that a single, modular, API‑first platform can fuse climate, infrastructure, and socioeconomic layers into a decision‑ready product.
- Hyper‑local AI is now feasible – Geospatial AI can drill down from district to building‑level risk, unlocking precise adaptation actions for water, flood, and agricultural systems.
- Policy‑oriented AI must be coupled with trust – Data sovereignty, transparent governance, and local capacity‑building are essential to avoid “black‑box” resistance.
- AI‑enabled payments & land‑use classification can automate subsidies for smallholder farmers, addressing long‑standing trust deficits in diversification schemes.
- Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) is the backbone – Scalable, publicly governed geospatial data rails are a prerequisite for climate‑AI at scale; current gaps are political, not technical.
- Operational gains are tangible – BWSSB’s AI‑driven water‑pumping and sewage‑treatment system saved ~₹1,000 crore / yr and improved groundwater forecasting.
- Real‑world impact evidence – Early‑season monsoon forecasts prevented premature planting; flood alerts in Bihar cut health expenditures by ~35 % and delivered 12–36× ROI.
- Affordability & access – Free, open‑source AI tools and government‑backed pilots can bridge the cost barrier for small‑holder farmers, even where land‑digitisation is incomplete.
- Collaboration is non‑negotiable – Successful deployment of AI for climate resilience demands continuous partnership among research labs, tech firms, NGOs, and public agencies.
The session highlighted that moving AI from sophisticated models to the masses is less about algorithmic breakthroughs and more about data accessibility, institutional trust, and human capacity. The combined demonstrations, panel insights, and keynote case studies set a clear roadmap for scaling AI‑driven climate resilience across India and other vulnerable regions.
See Also:
- harnessing-ai-for-water-resilience-and-sustainable-growth
- empowering-communities-in-the-age-of-advanced-ai-inclusion-and-safety-for-sustainable-development
- flipping-the-script-how-the-global-majority-can-recode-the-ai-economy
- preparing-to-monitor-the-impacts-of-agents-closing-the-global-assurance-divide-for-safe-and-trusted-ai
- from-evidence-to-scale-testing-financing-and-operationalizing-technology-and-ai-for-development-and-humanitarian-action
- ai-for-esg-responsible-innovation-for-people-planet-and-progress
- ai-for-the-global-south-from-governance-to-inclusion
- panel-on-the-2026-international-ai-safety-report
- ai-commons-for-the-global-south-data-models-and-compute-for-half-of-humanity
- effective-ai-assessments-verification-and-assurance-establishing-the-foundations-for-responsible-confidence-in-ai