Impact of AI on Tech-Enabled Services: Redefining India’s Next Growth Engine

Abstract

The panel examined how AI is moving beyond automation toward “agentic” execution, questioning whether India’s historic cost‑arbitrage advantage in tech‑enabled services will survive. Panelists traced the sector’s explosive growth (from ~300 k employees & $5bnrevenueintheY2Kerato6millionstaffand$280 bn today), identified emerging service‑line opportunities (analytics, revenue‑cycle‑management, AI‑orchestrated workflows), and argued that India must shift from a pure labour‑supply model to a product‑and‑outcome‑centric ecosystem. They debated structural changes needed in talent development, pricing models, and organisational culture, and placed India’s AI ambitions against the global AI race (US, China, Europe). The discussion closed with a rapid Q&A on AI‑cost economics, the future shape of the workforce pyramid, and the strategic role of quantum/computing in keeping India competitive.

Detailed Summary

• Moderator (Sapna Bhatnagar) introduced the theme: AI is moving from “automation” to autonomous execution. She referenced a recent comment by Vinod Khosla at the AI Summit that BPO and IT services could “disappear” within four‑to‑five years, framing the urgency for India to capture the AI wave rather than be displaced.
• Panelist introductions (each gave a concise bio, linking personal experience to the AI‑services theme).

2. The Historical Landscape of India’s Tech‑Enabled Services

Metric	Past (≈ 1999‑2000)	Today (2024)
Employees	< 300 k	≈ 6 million (direct) + many‑million indirect
Revenue	$4‑5 bn	≈ $280 bn (≈ 55× growth)
Growth driver	Cost arbitrage (labour)	Blend of labour, process & domain expertise, and increasingly AI‑enabled capabilities

• Akshay Khanna stressed that the sector’s size makes it a key pillar of India’s economy and a global service hub. He noted the “process knowledge” accumulated over decades – deep understanding of banking, telecom, and other vertical workflows – as a competitive moat beyond cheap manpower.

3. AI as a Disruptive Force

• Key Insight (Akshay): AI will augment rather than replace the existing workforce. Agents will handle “low‑value, repeatable tasks,” while humans will shift to orchestration, design, and domain‑specific integration.
• Jagdish Mitra added that the “agentic AI” market is still nascent; the real question is “when”, not “if.” He cautioned against speculative timelines (“five years”, “three years”) but affirmed the inevitability of a structural shift.

4. Market Outlook & New Service‑Line Opportunities

• Chandrika Dutt highlighted that India’s market share in global services presently sits at ≈ 20‑25 % of a $1.8 tn market (including R&D‑outsourcing, BPM).
• High‑growth niches: Analytics (20 %+ CAGR), Revenue‑Cycle‑Management (RCM), AI‑orchestrated workflow platforms, and product‑as‑service models.
• Som Chatterjee (Prism Force) described a “vertical AI platform for workforce and skill management” serving ~30 leading tech‑services firms, positioning itself as a “prism” over talent pipelines.

5. Structural Shifts Required for Service Providers

Suggested Shift	Rationale
Product‑centric innovation (internal AI/ML platforms, not just services)	Enables higher‑value revenue and reduces reliance on pure “billing‑hour” models.
Outcome‑based pricing (pay‑for‑impact, not just time‑and‑material)	Forces providers to own business results, encouraging deeper AI integration.
Leadership & cultural change (empowering product teams, removing “billing‑hour” metrics)	Breaks the “lab‑experiment” mindset; aligns incentives with long‑term value creation.
Accelerated up‑skilling & reskilling (focus on AI‑tool fluency, domain‑AI synthesis)	Addresses the skill‑gap as entry‑level coding drops to ~20 % of work.

• Akshay and Chandrika agreed that “process expertise + AI agents” is the new value proposition.
• Swapnil Bhatnagar stressed the need for “outcome‑based contracts”, but noted the practical difficulty of defining measurable outcomes—most providers revert to traditional models during procurement.

6. Workforce Transformation

• Pyramid vs. Diamond Model: Traditional base‑heavy hiring (mass graduate intake) is under threat from AI‑co‑pilots.
• Industry observations: IBM announced a one‑third hiring increase for entry‑level (Gen‑Z) staff in the US, signalling a partial retreat from pure cost‑cutting.
• Panel consensus:
  • Entry‑level tasks will be automated, but mid‑level managers will need AI‑orchestration skills.
  • Future skill hierarchy: Problem‑solving → domain expertise → AI‑tool fluency → orchestration.
• Reskilling statistics (cited by Jagdish): 58‑60 million Indians are digitally skilled; an additional 30 million must be trained in advanced technologies by 2026.

7. The Role of Academia, Industry, and Government

• Jagdish argued that skill development cannot be left solely to academic institutions; the speed of AI change demands self‑driven learning and industry‑backed “co‑op” programs.
• Chandrika emphasized tripartite collaboration (industry‑academia‑government) and suggested hackathons, open‑source contributions, and AI‑driven assessment tools as the next‑generation training mechanisms.
• Swapnil echoed the need for institutional guardrails (e.g., AI‑ethics frameworks) to ensure responsible deployment.

8. India’s Position in the Global AI Race

Region	Focus	India’s Comparative Edge
US	Private‑capital‑driven frontier models	–
China	State‑aligned, fine‑tuned models	–
Europe	Regulation & trust	–
India	Multilingual AI, inclusive digital public infrastructure	Huge linguistic diversity, large talent pool, cost‑effective service delivery

• Panelists agreed that India must be a “third alternative”, leveraging multilingual AI to serve a large domestic market and export domain‑specific solutions.
• Sarpham & other Indian AI firms were cited as examples of low‑cost, high‑impact language models targeting banking & finance.

9. Investment, KPI, and Success Metrics

• Investment horizon: $20 bn AI commitments in India by 2025, spanning compute, applications, foundational models, talent, data pipelines.
• Suggested KPIs (per discussion):
  1. AI‑contributed GDP growth (target: > 1.5 % by 2030).
  2. Number of globally‑competent AI‑driven products (e.g., language models, domain‑specific agents).
  3. Share of export‑driven deep‑tech revenues (goal: > 50 % of AI‑related revenues from overseas).
  4. Skilled workforce metric – 30 million up‑skilled in advanced AI by 2026.
• Sarpham highlighted the need to track profitability impact per quarter for AI‑enabled services, not just top‑line revenue.

10. Cost Considerations & Business‑Model Economics

• Audience Q&A (Vinny) raised the token‑cost explosion (e.g., a “browser‑building” project costing $14 m in tokens).
• Akshay responded that margins can turn negative if firms indiscriminately burn tokens; the business case must be ROI‑driven.
• Future cost‑reduction levers:
  • Scale‑driven hardware investment (GPU farms).
  • Open‑source model proliferation (China & India leading).
  • Selective use of high‑cost, high‑accuracy LLMs only where the value‑add exceeds cost.

11. Closing Reflections

• Consensus: AI will reshape but not eradicate the tech‑services ecosystem. The critical capability for India is rapid domain‑AI integration, leveraging existing process expertise and new AI‑orchestration talent.
• Key strategic recommendation: Invest in next‑generation compute (quantum/neuromorphic) to lower AI‑CapEx and maintain competitiveness.
• The panel thanked the audience and invited final rapid‑fire questions, ending the session after a brief thank‑you and applause.

Key Takeaways

• India’s tech‑services sector has grown ~55× in revenue and 20× in workforce since Y2K, making it a cornerstone of the national economy.
• AI will augment, not replace, the Indian labour pool; human expertise will shift toward orchestration, design, and domain‑specific integration.
• Process and domain knowledge remain India’s strongest moat, and coupling it with agentic AI creates a new competitive advantage.
• Outcome‑based pricing and product‑centric innovation are essential structural shifts for service providers to stay relevant.
• Reskilling is urgent: 58–60 million are digitally skilled, but 30 million more must acquire advanced AI capabilities by 2026.
• India’s comparative edge lies in multilingual AI and cost‑effective delivery, positioning it as a “third alternative” in the global AI race.
• Investment focus should be on building AI infrastructure, open‑source models, and next‑gen computing (quantum/neuromorphic) to reduce long‑term CapEx.
• KPIs for success include AI‑driven GDP contribution, share of export‑oriented deep‑tech revenue, number of domain‑specific AI products, and measurable workforce up‑skilling.
• Token‑cost economics matter: firms must apply AI selectively, ensuring ROI justifies the high compute costs.
• Collaboration among industry, academia, and government (via hackathons, co‑op programs, and AI‑driven assessments) is the most viable route to rapid, inclusive skill development.

---

See Also:

• scaling-enterprise-transformation-how-india-can-leapfrog-in-the-ai-economy
• ai-for-all-catalysing-jobs-growth-and-opportunity
• ai-for-industries-resilience-innovation-and-efficiency
• ai-for-economic-growth-and-social-good-ai-for-all-driving-economic-advancement-and-societal-well-being
• reskilling-for-tomorrow-ai-sustainability-and-indias-jobs-transition
• ai-for-inclusive-societal-development
• ai-literacy-building-skills-inclusion-and-global-leadership
• stacked-for-scale-the-future-of-ai-compute-semiconductors-and-foundational-ai
• ai-for-economic-development-and-social-good
• democratizing-ai-resources-in-india